top of page
Writer's pictureThe CareCoverage Team

Understanding Why “Medicare For All” Died This Election Season

Understanding Why “Medicare For All” Died This Election Season
Understanding Why “Medicare For All” Died This Election Season

By Bjorn Dyberg


Remember when "Medicare for All" was a defining issue in politics? Back in the thick of the debate, Vice President Kamala Harris was one of its loudest champions. As a California senator, she stood shoulder to shoulder with Senator Bernie Sanders, co-sponsoring his universal healthcare legislation and calling for a complete overhaul of the healthcare system—even advocating for the elimination of private insurance. It was a bold stance, meant to capture the hearts of progressive voters, but it sparked plenty of controversy.


For most Americans, though, “Medicare for All” wasn’t just a catchphrase—it represented a radical transformation of the healthcare landscape. To many, it felt like too much, too soon. The idea of a single-payer system, which would replace existing programs like Medicare and Medicaid and fundamentally restructure the healthcare market and tax system, raised serious questions and implications for doctors, patients, and families across the country.

Supporters argued it was the only way to make healthcare a guaranteed right for all. They claimed it would lower costs by slashing administrative expenses and negotiating better prices for services and medications. But opponents warned it would mean more government control, less competition, and fewer choices for patients. And then there's the price tag—a single-payer system would require trillions in new government spending, inevitably driving up taxes for everyone. Many also feared longer wait times, reduced care quality, and rationed services, pointing to similar systems in other countries as cautionary tales.


But the political landscape has shifted dramatically since then. Harris, once a standard bearer of the progressive movement, has pivoted toward the center, reflecting her role as the loyal lieutenant to President Joe Biden, a leader known for his centrist leanings. As Harris rocketed into her current standing as presidential nominee of the Democratic Party, she adjusted her policies to appeal to a broader electorate. The dramatic shift became more evident when she distanced herself from her earlier progressive positions, including her support for “Medicare for All.”


Gone were the bold promises to eliminate private insurance; instead, her team quickly clarified her stance, focusing on more moderate reforms that would appeal to a wider range of voters. This shift mirrors a broader trend within the Democratic Party—a move away from sweeping reforms and overly broad slogans-for-policy like “Medicare for All” in favor of changes that are seen as more politically viable.


With Harris now in the spotlight, one thing is clear: “Medicare for All” is dead. The political winds have changed, and the focus has moved from radical change to strengthening what we already have. Under the Biden-Harris administration, there’s been a concerted effort to build on the Affordable Care Act (ACA), increase subsidies to help with premium costs, encourage states to expand Medicaid, and reduce prescription drug prices.


For instance, the administration recently allowed Medicare to negotiate directly with pharmaceutical companies, a step that lowers costs for some common medications. While this primarily benefits Medicare recipients, it sets the stage for broader efforts to tackle drug prices. Other targeted measures—like capping out-of-pocket expenses for seniors, expanding telehealth services, and funding community health centers—are designed to make healthcare more accessible without completely overhauling the system.

So, where does this leave us? While Americans still want change, they seem less interested in a radical overhaul that would disrupt their own healthcare choices. Instead, the focus is shifting to gradual reforms that make the system work better for everyone.


Looking ahead, the future of American healthcare is more likely to be shaped by steady, incremental improvements rather than sweeping reforms. The 2024 election will be crucial in setting the direction, but one thing is certain: “Medicare for All,” once a rallying cry for progressives, has faded from the front lines. The conversation is now about how to refine and improve what’s already in place—balancing public needs with private options and finding ways to make healthcare more affordable and accessible for all.


Bjorn Dyberg is the Beacon Award-winning founder of CareCoverage, a health insurance agency licensed in 32 states. To connect with Bjorn or to explore how he can help you secure health insurance coverage, email bjorndyberg@carecoverage.net


0 views
bottom of page